Question about the Grunt vs SWAT cluster for Operator

MxS/SE/HIC/E
danteh
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 10:42 pm

Re: Question about the Grunt vs SWAT cluster for Operator

Post by danteh »

close_fox wrote:
danteh wrote:I am not thinking in terms of body parts and am surprised how fast this whole topic turned into my wanting to do a bro split. All I was wondering was why the SWAT and Grunt Clusters focus on completely separate MAJOR muscle groups. One cluster is hitting your chest and hams and ignoring shoulders and quads. Other is hitting shoulders and quads and ignoring chest and hams. I don't care that they are not being hit. I'd like to know the thought process behind having those exercises designated to those clusters. Why would LE officers benefit more from focusing their work on their chest and hams rather than their shoulders and quads?
I think the salty replies were just attempts at humor, maybe lost in translation.

Here's my understanding:

First, your question is addressed in the TB1 discussion of Operator template clusters. I don't say that to be a jerk; I am pointing it out to make sure you get it from the source.

Here is my understanding:

The Grunt and SWAT clusters are not designed to prioritize different muscle groups. They are designed to build strength while prioritizing different levels of exertion based on operational realities.

Infantry, SOF, etc. are typically "live" extensive E as part of their jobs. They therefore have to train extensive E also. Their bodies can't afford the "big lifts" like squat and bench 3x/week on top of carrying a heavy E load. It would be great if grunts could run the big lifts on top of their E marathons, but that just isn't reality for most people. Grunt cluster allows them to squat and press in a way that builds strength without hurting their E abilities. Front squat and overhead press use lighter loads, which put less stress on their bodies, which allows them to enjoy many fun hours of rucking, swimming, LSS running, etc.

By contrast, most LEOs do not live (or need to train) extensive E. They can therefore afford the physical cost of big lifts like squat and bench. SWAT cluster allows them to build strength in the most efficient way possible - lifting heavy weight via the big lifts.

Clusters aren't designed to hit every plane of movement (or body part). Areas not addressed by cluster lifts (e.g., vertical press for SWAT users, horizontal press for Grunt users) can and should be addressed during conditioning sessions.

Finally, TB takes the fresh approach of stripping strength down to it's raw, simple elements. It releases us from feeling a need to do everything, all the time. If someone works up to a bodyweight overhead press without training bench at all, I bet you a dollar their bench will be close to 1.5xBW. And vice versa. Same with FSQ vs SQ. Choose one, or alternate for blocks, based on your needs and goals. And get balance from your conditioning session exercises.

Exactly what I was looking for.

Thank you.

Dovx
Posts: 19
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2016 6:54 pm

Re: Question about the Grunt vs SWAT cluster for Operator

Post by Dovx »

Don't fall into paralysis by analysis...

Use any template from the book, no need to invent warm water...; alternate every few cycles if you want. People who are preparing for any course or selection need to realize that in conditioning part is far more important to do specific stuff than in strength training. Horizontal vs vertical push/pull and other stuff are for playing later. Build overall strength , build endurance (as much specific as you can) , work on your skills (it's not all about fitness).

Ten8
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:20 am

Re: Question about the Grunt vs SWAT cluster for Operator

Post by Ten8 »

Green2Blue wrote:
danteh wrote:I am not thinking in terms of body parts and am surprised how fast this whole topic turned into my wanting to do a bro split. All I was wondering was why the SWAT and Grunt Clusters focus on completely separate MAJOR muscle groups. One cluster is hitting your chest and hams and ignoring shoulders and quads. Other is hitting shoulders and quads and ignoring chest and hams. I don't care that they are not being hit. I'd like to know the thought process behind having those exercises designated to those clusters. Why would LE officers benefit more from focusing their work on their chest and hams rather than their shoulders and quads?
1. They're joking about the split :)

2. You say you aren't thinking in terms of body parts, but you quite literally are. "One cluster is hitting your chest and hams and ignoring shoulders and quads. Other is hitting shoulders and quads and ignoring chest and hams." That's just not the case. Bench hits pecs and delts, OHP hits pecs and delts, back squat hits quads and hams, front squat hits quads and hams. One exercise might emphasize one over the other, but they both muscle groups get worked.

2.5. Here's an example.

Rich Froning, top crossfitter: http://theathleticbuild.com/wp-content/ ... 639560.jpg . Crossfit has a lot of overhead work and front squat type movements, but almost no bench or back squat. But clearly Rich isn't lacking in pecs or hams.

Dan Greene, top powerlifter: https://standontheshouldersofgiants.fil ... 11/dan.jpg. Powerlifting uses bench and back squat, not OHP and front squat. But obviously not lacking in quads or delts.

Now obviously the two men cross over and do the other movements, but great emphasis is placed on their sport specific movements. And yet there clearly aren't lacking anywhere.

3. To answer your original question, which doc and the book already answered, it's about load. You can bench and back squat more than you can OHP and front squat respectively. More load means more stress on the body. More stress on the body means less recoverable capacity for training other qualities, like endurance. "Grunts" need more endurance than "SWATs". I've been in both fields, this is fact. So "Grunts" need more energy left over after their strength training to work on that endurance.

If you go back to crossfit vs powerlifting the same principle applies. Crossfitters need more endurance than powerlifters.

So to put it simply, OHP and front squat place less stress on the body than bench and back squat, and therefore leave more energy for endurance training. The difference is minor, but that's the reason.
You articulated this very very well. This is what I try and explain to people about clusters when I have to but can't seem to put it into words like this. This and Close Fox's post should be stickied imho.

Ten8
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 2:20 am

Re: Question about the Grunt vs SWAT cluster for Operator

Post by Ten8 »

This turned into an awesome thread, G2B, Close Fox, DovX and the rest, nicely explained.

Post Reply