DocOctagon wrote:I don't think you have to worry about this unless it's excessive. People tend to overestimate what "excessive" is as it relates to cardio. If you run a few marathons every year, you're probably at risk. Running LSS 30-45 minutes 3-5 x week isn't going to do it and in fact will probably help by reducing fat, lowering RHR (more relaxed = less cortisol), and enhancing brain dopamine.TBPenguin wrote:Barkadion wrote:We've been discussing lifting after 40 and up. OK. Makes sense. But what about conditioning?
It seems to be still beneficial according to the study. But yes, of course it is better to start in eariler age.
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/ ... 050514.php
"Despite biological changes with age, the heart still seems - even at the age of 40 - amenable to modification by endurance training. Starting at the age of 40 does not seem to impair the cardiac benefits"
Now if only the gonads would do the same. KB's reminder of what excess conditioning will do to hormones was a good one. Does anybody have a good way of detecting practical limits, or should we just go with known minimums? For me it seems easier to tell when lifting is excessive.
Short HIC sessions should only help. Brief high intensity efforts increase both testosterone and growth hormone. Studies abound.
Doing 2-5 two hour LSS runs per week on the other hand, probably shouldn't be your bread and butter unless you're preparing for special operations or endurance racing.
Do you recall what the details were for doing the HIC to boost hormones?
I've had no adverse reaction to doing LSS 2x or 3x at 30-35 minutes a time, don't know if that is enough to provide much benefit.