SE - Difference in Approach
Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 11:51 pm
I recently came across the Navy SEAL Physical Training guide and thought that it was well put together. It is very similar in terms of approach and theory of the fine TB work.
One departure I noticed was with regards to SE prep. We are all familiar with Alpha and Bravo circuits.
The SEAL guide advocates focusing on one SE exercise at a time, sub maximal reps, with abbreviated rest time. For example, push-ups would be 4-5 sets of 15-20 reps with slow eccentric portion and 1 minute rest between sets. Only after completing push ups would you move on to the next exercise, like sit-ups.
What gives rise to the slight variation in approach? Would one approach train SE slightly differently than the other? Or no material difference?
I know both are good approaches, I'm curious if either elicits different training responses, or in the end, they both end up in the same place.
http://navyseals.com/wp-content/uploads ... -guide.pdf
One departure I noticed was with regards to SE prep. We are all familiar with Alpha and Bravo circuits.
The SEAL guide advocates focusing on one SE exercise at a time, sub maximal reps, with abbreviated rest time. For example, push-ups would be 4-5 sets of 15-20 reps with slow eccentric portion and 1 minute rest between sets. Only after completing push ups would you move on to the next exercise, like sit-ups.
What gives rise to the slight variation in approach? Would one approach train SE slightly differently than the other? Or no material difference?
I know both are good approaches, I'm curious if either elicits different training responses, or in the end, they both end up in the same place.
http://navyseals.com/wp-content/uploads ... -guide.pdf