TBPenguin wrote:
Something that may not mean anything, but maybe gets back to scaling things for the over 40 club. The books suggested that Gladiator (5 sets, 3x a week) could usually only be run for a couple of blocks. The books also suggested that Mass (4 sets, 3x a week) was difficult to run for long, conditioning had to be kept in check. Those comments were general, not aimed at the After 40 Club members. On the reddit board TupeloDanger wrote that doing either of those for long was a bit much for him, and said he was over 40. Putting these together, it seems that if an over 40 guy ran Operator as described here, it may not last long, since Operator with 4 or 5 sets is pretty close to the old Mass and Gladiator. So maybe plan on just doing it for a block? Or maybe the lower frequency of Zulu would make it more feasible? Just wondering, I have no answers.
My thoughts on this:
Mass template was meant to be used with a Heavy exercise cluster. That's 4 major lifts which is pretty hardcore and probably only sustainable short term (for the 40+ crowd anyway).
Using Operator with BP/SQ/WPU + DL (4 sets) is a totally different animal. Don't forget you can practically eliminate any hard conditioning by choosing the right HICs. This shouldn't be hard to sustain, especially if you use a training max.
Gladiator's suggested cluster was deadlift and press I think, which I can see being hard to sustain for more than a few weeks. With any other exercise besides the DL, it would be fine for average trainees doing 5x5. I mean it's two exercises 5x5. It's the same or less volume than current existing "5 x 5" linear programs and it's easier because of the undulating (?) TB style of periodization. Throw in the training max as a cherry on top plus the reduced cardio and you're good to go.
Work capacity varies (for all ages) but I personally don't see Operator with a 3 ex cluster (+deadlift) for 4 sets being unmanageable by any means. Not even close if you compare it to Texas or other similar templates.